Genesis of cultural landscape

The article highlights that the modern idea of cultural landscape is ambiguous. Today, there are three fundamentally different interpretations term "cultural landscape", based on dominant factors: natural, or information environment. Thus, some researchers adhere to traditional approach and define a as an anthropogenic landscape, i.e. natural place, changed by person according certain programme, which has high aesthetic functional qualities. other understanding area been place residence for group people who carriers specific values long historical period. Most often, these groups ethnic religious communities. There also this informational one, active role intellectual spiritual activity in shaping landscape; it important emphasize cultural, preserved transmitted from one generation another form not only determine formation development but part it, being influenced other, material components landscape. complexity ambiguity world determines attitude towards environment, requiring new comprehension it. Architecture urban planning field covers all manifestations human activity, where most thing space modeling artificial integral holistic world. environment holistic, organized constantly surrounds person, with help architecture actively influencing unified process forming twofold structure (the architectural models combining into single whole). By creating life, multifaceted impact people, strongest influence through visual perception, always associated forms perception A work (something fictional, imaginary) "dressed" real city reproduces its structure, mechanism translating myths fictions caused conditions physical dimension, become reality play forms, images meanings.